AI video models: price per second, clip length, 4K
| Model | Credits/sec · base tier, with audio | Credits/sec · 4K / 2K, with audio | Clip length | Audio track | Inputs and references | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 | 400 (720p / 1080p) | 600 (4K) | 4 / 6 / 8 s | Optional (cheaper without) | Text-to-video; image-to-video from a first frame | Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast |
| Veo 3.1 Fast | 150 (720p / 1080p) | 350 (4K) | 4 / 6 / 8 s | Optional (cheaper without) | Text-to-video; image-to-video from a first frame | Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast |
| Grok Imagine | 150 (480p / 720p / 1080p) | — | 4 / 6 / 8 / 10 / 12 / 15 s | Optional (same price) | Text-to-video; one first-frame image (up to 1080p) or 2–7 reference images (up to 720p) | Grok Imagine vs MiniMax-H3 |
| MiniMax-H3 | 120 (768P) | 200 (2K) | 5–15 s, 1-second steps | Always included | Text-to-video; up to 9 reference images, 3 reference videos and 3 audio clips | Grok Imagine vs MiniMax-H3 |
| Seedance 2.0 | 340 (480p / 720p); 580 (1080p) | — | 4–15 s, 1-second steps | Optional (same price) | Text-to-video; up to 9 reference images, 3 reference videos and 3 audio clips. Reference-video duration is added to billed seconds. | Seedance guide |
| Seedance 2.0 Fast | 340 (480p / 720p) | — | 4–15 s, 1-second steps | Optional (same price) | Text-to-video; up to 9 reference images, 3 reference videos and 3 audio clips. No 1080p tier. Reference-video duration is added to billed seconds. | Seedance guide |
| Seedance 2.5 | 171.36 (480p); 367.2 (720p) | — | 4–30 s, 1-second steps | Optional (same price) | Text-to-video; up to 30 reference images, 10 reference videos and 10 audio clips. A reference video uses its own per-second rate. | Seedance guide |
Credits per second with the audio track on (MiniMax-H3 always includes audio). 1,000 credits ≈ US$1; prices come from the live model catalog at build time, the same list as the pricing page.
AI image models: price per image at 1K, 2K, 4K
| Model | Credits/image · 1K | Credits/image · 2K | Credits/image · 4K | Reference images | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Banana | 20 | 20 | — | Up to 5 | — |
| Nano Banana Pro | 90 | 100 | 180 | Up to 14 | Nano Banana Pro vs GPT Image 2.5: Prices and Reference Images |
| Nano Banana 2 | 80 | 100 | 150 | Up to 14 | — |
| GPT Image 2 | 70 | 90 | 100 | Up to 14 | Nano Banana Pro vs GPT Image 2.5: Prices and Reference Images |
| GPT Image 2.5 | 60 | 80 | 100 | Up to 5 | Nano Banana Pro vs GPT Image 2.5: Prices and Reference Images |
| GPT Image 2.5 Flare | 60 | 80 | 100 | Up to 14 | Nano Banana Pro vs GPT Image 2.5: Prices and Reference Images |
| GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst | 60 | 80 | 100 | Up to 14 | Nano Banana Pro vs GPT Image 2.5: Prices and Reference Images |
Credits per image at available resolutions, using the sale rate where offered. Prices come from the same catalog as the pricing page.
Side-by-side comparisons and alternatives
Video model comparison
Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast
How far apart the two Veo tiers are and when to switch.
- Veo 3.1 Fast
- Veo 3.1
Video model comparison
Grok Imagine vs MiniMax-H3
The two lowest-priced video tiers: flat-price 1080p vs 2K and reference inputs.
- Grok Imagine
- MiniMax-H3
Image model catalog comparison
Nano Banana Pro vs GPT Image 2.5: Prices and Reference Images
Nano Banana Pro vs GPT Image 2.5, Flare and Sunburst: prices, 4K and references by channel; legacy GPT Image 2 retained.
- Nano Banana Pro
- GPT Image 2.5
Alternatives
Sora alternatives after OpenAI’s Sora shutdown
OpenAI has shut Sora down. This page compares Veo, Grok and MiniMax; Seedance has its own guide.
- Veo 3.1
- Veo 3.1 Fast
- Grok Imagine
- MiniMax-H3
Alternatives
Kling alternatives you can run right now
Kling is not on RelayMe. This page compares Veo, Grok and MiniMax for image-to-video; Seedance has its own guide.
- Veo 3.1
- Veo 3.1 Fast
- Grok Imagine
- MiniMax-H3
Platform alternative
ComfyUI alternatives without a local GPU
No GPU: ComfyUI, Comfy Cloud and per-generation credits compared, and when to stay on ComfyUI.
- ComfyUI
- Comfy Cloud
- RelayMe
Platform alternative
Wireflow alternative: how RelayMe compares
Two node canvases compared on plans, credits, models, team features and agent access, with sources.
- Wireflow
- RelayMe
Platform alternative
Google Flow alternative for pay-as-you-go product videos
Google’s own Veo and Nano Banana front end: plan credits, cost per generation, API and pay-as-you-go, with sources.
- Google Flow
- Veo 3.1
- RelayMe
Platform alternative
Higgsfield alternative: how RelayMe compares
A subscription creative suite vs a pay-as-you-go canvas: plans, credit expiry and top-up rules, model range, with sources.
- Higgsfield
- Kling
- Veo 3.1
- RelayMe
Platform alternative
Pebblely alternative: monthly product photos vs RelayMe credits
Pebblely’s monthly image quotas versus RelayMe’s per-generation credits for product stills and video, with sources.
- Pebblely
- Product photos
- RelayMe
Platform alternative
Photoroom alternative: the ecommerce visual editor vs RelayMe
Photoroom’s yearly-billed plans, AI credits and video-ad allowance versus RelayMe’s node canvas, with sources.
- Photoroom
- Product video
- RelayMe
Platform alternative
Creatify alternative: AI ad videos vs Seedance on RelayMe
Creatify ad credits, avatars and Kling versus Seedance and the other video models on RelayMe, with sources.
- Creatify
- Seedance
- Kling
- RelayMe
Platform alternative
AdCreative.ai alternative: ad credits vs a RelayMe workflow
AdCreative.ai’s homepage monthly prices and credits versus RelayMe’s pay-as-you-go workflow, with sources.
- AdCreative.ai
- Ad credits
- RelayMe
Run all of these models in one workflow
Connect one prompt to several model nodes, run once and compare side by side; the task history shows the exact credits each run used. Free to start, no credit card required.
What a node-based AI workflow is, and the nodes you can use today →